Court:
Supreme Court
Subject:
Judicial Review
Catchwords:
Judicial Review-Application for leave-Television station holder of exclusive broadcasting rights to English Premier League matches-Customer complaints to Regulator that application advertised matches not broadcast online-Regulator decided applicant engaged in misleading advertising as matches not broadcast as advertised-Suitability of alternate remedies-Grounds and evidence relied on by applicant must disclose arguable case-Failing test of arguability is a bar to grant of discretionary relief
Section 12, 16, 20 and 22 of the Broadcasting & Radio Re-Diffusion Act
Television and Sound Broadcasting Regulations, Regulation 30
Part 56 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2002
Document Type:
Year:
2024
Suit/Claim number:
SU2024CV01686
Neutral Citation:
[2024] JMSC Civ 179
Judge(s):
Wint-Blair, J