You are here

Hudson, Winston v Michael Fagan and Yvonne Fagan

Court: 
Supreme Court
Catchwords: 

Injunction-Threshold test-Whether serious issue to be tired-Whether the balance of convenience lies in favour of the grant of injunctive relief-Whether damages are an adequate remedy

Restrictive convenant-Breach of restictive covenant-Whether the restrictive covenant creates an inviolable right-Whether the restrictive covenant creates an inviolable right-Whether the restrictive covenant creates an absolute right for all time-Defence-Whether delay or acquiescence

Remedies-Whether grant of injunctive relief-Whether award of damages-The Judicature (Supreme Court) Act, section 49(h), The Restrictive Covenants (Discharge and Modification) Act, sections 3 and 4, The Town and Country Planning Act, section 22(3), Civil Procedure Rules, 2002, rules 17.1(1)(a) and 17.4

Document Type:

Year: 
2022
Suit/Claim number: 
SU 2021 CV 02781
Neutral Citation: 
[2022] JMSC Civ 163
Judge(s): 
A. Nembhard J