Court:
Supreme Court
Catchwords:
Company-Claim brought by company directions against debenture holders-Company later placed in receivership-Appointment of receiver by debenture holders-Directors continuing claim without consent of receiver-Debenture holders applying to have claim struck out for failing to secure receiver's consent-Concurrent power in receiver and directions to bring action in the name of the company-Whether consent of receiver required-Whether indemnity necessary if no consent is given-Whether claim should be struck out if no security for costs is provided-Applicability of section 388 of Companies Act
Document Type:
Year:
2014
Suit/Claim number:
2010 HCV 02413
Neutral Citation:
[2014] JMCC Comm. 7