You are here

Attorney-General (The) v Cenitech Engineering Solutions Limited, the Integrity Commission (formerly the Contractor General) and National Contracts Commission and National Contracts Commission v Cenitech Engineering Solutions Limited, the Integrity Commission (formerly the Contractor General) and the Attroney-General [Consolidated Claims]

Court: 
Court of Appeal
Catchwords: 

Judicial Review-Vicarious liability of Attorney-General as the Crown's representative in judicial review proceedings-Whether Full Court was correct to order assessment of damages against Attorney-General for conduct of statutory body in judicial review proceedings-Sections 2(2) and 13 of the Crown Proceeding Act-Basis upon which damages can be granted in application for administrative orders under Part 56 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2002 ("CPR')-Whether an assessment of damages can be ordered in judicial review proceeding in the absence of a claim for breach of Constitution or cause of action in private law-Rules 56.1, 56.9 and 56.10 of the CPR-Section 48(g) of the Judicature (Supreme Court) Act

Costs-Bullock order-Whether the Full Court property exercised its discretion to make an order that the costs of successful defendant be paid by unsuccessful defendants in judicial review proceedings.

Document Type:

Year: 
2023
Suit/Claim number: 
COA2021CV00035
Neutral Citation: 
[2023] KMCA Civ 52
Judge(s): 
McDonald-Bishop