Civil Procedure-Application for relief from sanctions-Multiple applications made by the claimant for relief from sanctions for the failure to file and exchange his witness statement within the time stipulated by order of the court-Application for relief from sanctions refused by the court-Res judicata-Whether the doctrine of res judicata applies to the subsequent application for relief for sanctions-Whether the doctrine of res judicate applies to discretionary decisions which are made at an interlocutory stage and before any findings of facts are made-Issue estoppel-Whether the doctrine of issue estoppel applies to the subsequent application for relief form sanctions-Whether the doctrine of issue estoppel applies to discretionary decisions which are made at an interlocutory state and before findings of fact are made-Abuse pf process-Whether the application for relief from sanctions amounts to an abuse of the process of the court-Whether the claimant has demonstrated that there has been a material change in circumstances so as to warrant the court's varying or rescinding a previous order of a court of concurrent jurisdiction
Constitutional relief-Whether specific provisions of the rules of the court are unconstitutional-Whether the requisite jurisdiction of the court is invoking to grant constitutional relief-Sections 16(2) and 19, The Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (Constitutional Amendment) Act 2011, Section 28 and 48(g), Judicature (Supreme Court) Act, Rules 8.1(3), 8.1(4), 8.8, 26.8(1), (2) and (3), 29.6, 29.11, 59.9 and 56.10, Civil Procedure Rules, 2002, as amended
