Court:
Supreme Court
Catchwords:
Action for Libel; whether words libelous on their face or by innendo; whether if libelous, defendant may avail itself of defence of Qualified Privilege as extended by Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd; whether apology made fulfils the terms of section 2 of the Libel and Slander Act; whether Exemplary or Aggravated Damages appropriate in this case; whether damages for libel may be updated as in the case of damages for personal injuries; quantum of damages.
Document Type:
Year:
2011
Suit/Claim number:
2004 HCV-1671